The first aim of the book is to be a chronicle but its secondary focus is at least of equal importance, and potentially of more interest to many readers: explanations from various perspectives for the directions taken, not only describing what happened but also why it happened. The scientist, the physician, the everyman, and the patient each interpret the story from their own vantage point, and their interpretations, their emphases, and meanings strikingly differ one from the other. In this book, the broad nature of history is presented and represented by the inclusion of four particular perspectives: (1) Science: scientific thought and theory has infiltrated not only medicine, but also personal and social life in a bidirectional way. Political and economic issues are powerful drivers of the scientific agenda, as are social influences on the direction of science. Science is frequently driven by the strong tides of the contemporary «Zeitgeist». (2) Medicine: ‘the burning problems are etiology, pathogenesis, and treatment’. In the context of epilepsy, medicine is essentially applied science, dependent on technological advances e.g., in neuroimaging, clinical chemistry and genetics, but also on cultural fashion and societal trends. Many medical theories and practices, once hegemonic, are now viewed as bizarre aberrations. Some, once enthusiastically adopted, were later rejected. The same fate will await many of our contemporary practices. (3) Society: contemporary culture and societal beliefs are of fundamental importance in setting the medical agenda. Cultural attitudes define how universities and the industry prosecute science, and how doctors practice medicine. Capitalism dominated the century discussed, and the impact of political and economic policy on medicine has been notable in the fields of pharmaceuticals, legislation, and healthcare. Funding and societal norms dictate how science and medicine are progressing. Pharmaceutical money, through sponsorship of professional organizations, determines much of the medical agenda. Social forces also exert their influence through legislation. Laws and rules are put in place in relation to consent, employment, education, driving institutionalization and civil rights. Centralized, state-controlled healthcare systems are in place as part of the ‘welfare state’ and in this setting, healthcare is perceived as a right not as a privilege, with both positive and negative consequences. All these factors have a large impact, not only on science and medicine, but also on the person with epilepsy and their caregivers. (4) The person with epilepsy: the insider’s view, obviously vital to the history of epilepsy, is the most difficult to unravel, but Simon Shorvon also impressively succeeds in this difficult topic. No single answer exists to the question ‘How does epilepsy feel?’. Individual reactions differ and any attempt to provide definitive descriptions of a multilayered and complex human experience is doomed to futility. A surrogate source of information about how epilepsy ‘feels’ and what it means is the depiction of epilepsy in biography, autobiography, literature, and film – a mixture of first- and third-person accounts, fiction, and fantasy. The book provides a treasure trove of striking and touching examples on many levels, open to different interpretations and sometimes deliberately ambiguous. However, the feelings, emotions, and thoughts of those with epilepsy can be explored with depth and subtlety through the unique mediation of the creative arts. Graphic art can also assist to indicate the emotional effects of epilepsy and its treatment in various guises and the illustrations in this book designed as they are by David Cobley are examples thereof.
Avec la fonction commentaires, nous proposons un espace pour un échange professionnel ouvert et critique. Celui-ci est ouvert à tous les abonné-e-s SHW Beta. Nous publions les commentaires tant qu’ils respectent nos lignes directrices.